The advertising industry has been listening to, and contributing to the debate over creativity for decades - since the DDB era. Some would argue the Ogilvy ear. Whatever.
In the era of CGC and Tivo, one thing has become apparent: the opinions of the lowest common denominator can no longer be ignored.
Ad Age warns that commercial ratings will soon restructure the way networks prioritize commercials.
Lord, let it happen before we get too far into the 2008 presidential season. Please. Political advertising is one of those bastardized artforms, like politics itself, that seems to breathe its own air - after all politicians are in the business of politicking, not marketing (although they sure TRY to cross that line, they are absolutely out of touch. Visit John Edwards' Second life campaign headquarters for agonizing evidence of this.)
The status quo will not fly if, everytime one of the candidates opens their yaps, they get the big red dot from 5 million DVR subscribers. Ditto for media tactics like the "This is our country" Chevy TV buy. Conversely, it'll be interesting if single-run spots get pleas for a second airing.
A magazine with tiny distribution recently stuck my ad on the back cover because the magazine liked the ad so much. (It was not particularly good - it just wasn't particularly bad.) This kind of motivation, in an era of voting for advertising with your clicker-thumbs, may finally force car dealers, drug manufacturers and financial institutions to catch up with the rest of the world (read: Nike, Macintosh, Geico and Budweiser, etc.) and create truly compelling commercial content.
The implications, especially for clients whose products are not compelling to begin with (think of the last women's hygeine product that didn't make you hate television advertising on priciple) are truly scary. Commercial-as-entertainment just doesn't work for a lot of products. Where will those ads end up? On truly
unwatchable cable, is my guess.